Thanks for the article links. I read the one in the Courant — which continues to be a rag and I only read Ned related stories online. I had to email Eliz. Hamilton to tell her, I think she was ok in balancing the pro and con vets — a good thing since Ned does not do a Bush/Cheney type of appearance in front of pre-approved ditto-heads.
I did take her to task, however, about the reference to the NYT article. Do these reporters actually look at blog sites? Did she actually read the entire email from Ned? Lazy reporting is why those who need to know must surf the blogosphere.
Thanks for the article links. I read the one in the Courant — which continues to be a rag and I only read Ned related stories online. I had to email Eliz. Hamilton to tell her, I think she was ok in balancing the pro and con vets — a good thing since Ned does not do a Bush/Cheney type of appearance in front of pre-approved ditto-heads.
I did take her to task, however, about the reference to the NYT article. Do these reporters actually look at blog sites? Did she actually read the entire email from Ned? Lazy reporting is why those who need to know must surf the blogosphere.